Jump to content

Salonga National Park: Difference between revisions

From The APES Atlas
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
= Site characteristics =
= Site characteristics =


Salonga National Park (SNP) is the largest protected area of pristine rainforest in the African continent (33,500 km²). Located south of the Congo river, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, it is a [https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/280/ UNESCO World Heritage] site and a stronghold for many endangered species. SNP, is divided into two blocks, North and South, separated by a 45 km wide inhabited buffer zone. Since 2015, the park is co-managed by the Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation (ICCN) in collaboration with the World Wide Fund for Nature ([https://www.wwf-congobasin.org/where_we_work/priority_places/salonga_national_park/ WWF]).
[[#R02009|Salonga National Park]] (SNP) is the largest protected area of pristine rainforest in the African continent (33,500 km²). Located south of the Congo river, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, it is a [https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/280/ UNESCO World Heritage] site and a stronghold for many endangered species. SNP, is divided into two blocks, North and South, separated by a 45 km wide inhabited buffer zone. Since 2015, the park is co-managed by the Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation (ICCN) in collaboration with the World Wide Fund for Nature ([https://www.wwf-congobasin.org/where_we_work/priority_places/salonga_national_park/ WWF]).
In addition to bonobos, SNP harbours one of the few remnant populations of forest elephants (''Loxodonta cyclotis'') in the country. SNP is also home to 8 species of monkeys: Thollon’s red colobus (''Piliocolobus tholloni''), the Angola Pied Colobus (''Colobus angolensis''), Allen’s Swamp Monkey (''Allenopithecus nigroviridis''), Red-tailed monkey (''Cercopithecus ascanius''), Wolf's mona monkey (''Cercopithecus wolfii''), De Brazza’s Monkey (''Cercopithecus neglectus''), the Black Mangabey (''Lophocebus aterrinus'') and the Golden-bellied mangabey (''Cercocebus chrysogaster''). A large ungulate community is found in the Park, including the forest buffalo (''Syncerus caffer'') and the endangered Bongo (''Tragelaphus euryceros''), along with large carnivores such a the leopard (''Panthera pardus'') and the African golden cat (''Caracal aurata''). Finally, SNP is a stronghold for other endangered mammals such as the Giant ground pangolin (''Smutsia gigantea''), and for stunning birds such as the endemic Congo peafowl (''Afropavo congensis''). The entomofauna and floral diversity is equally rich, with many species expected being still unknown to science.
In addition to bonobos, SNP harbours one of the few remnant populations of forest elephants (''Loxodonta cyclotis'') in the country. SNP is also home to 8 species of monkeys: Thollon’s red colobus (''Piliocolobus tholloni''), the Angola Pied Colobus (''Colobus angolensis''), Allen’s Swamp Monkey (''Allenopithecus nigroviridis''), Red-tailed monkey (''Cercopithecus ascanius''), Wolf's mona monkey (''Cercopithecus wolfii''), De Brazza’s Monkey (''Cercopithecus neglectus''), the Black Mangabey (''Lophocebus aterrinus'') and the Golden-bellied mangabey (''Cercocebus chrysogaster''). A large ungulate community is found in the Park, including the forest buffalo (''Syncerus caffer'') and the endangered Bongo (''Tragelaphus euryceros''), along with large carnivores such a the leopard (''Panthera pardus'') and the African golden cat (''Caracal aurata''). Finally, SNP is a stronghold for other endangered mammals such as the Giant ground pangolin (''Smutsia gigantea''), and for stunning birds such as the endemic Congo peafowl (''Afropavo congensis''). The entomofauna and floral diversity is equally rich, with many species expected being still unknown to science.


Line 63: Line 63:
|-
|-
|''Pan paniscus''
|''Pan paniscus''
|2005
|2016-2018
|
|
|1.15
|0.27 (0.14-0.56)
|541 (281-1,119)
|Salonga Lokofa (2,000 km²)
|Line transects
|
|
|Grossmann et al. 2008
|0.54 (0.21-1.21)
|9,246 (3,596-20,720)
|Salonga National Park, South block (17,000 km²,)
|Camera trap
|
|
|[[#R01622|Bessone et al. 2020]]
|
|
|COD0195
|-
|-
|''Pan paniscus''
|''Pan paniscus''
Line 84: Line 84:
|Line transects
|Line transects
|
|
|WCS 2015
|[[#R01636|WCS 2015]]
|
|
|
|COD0186
|-
|-
|''Pan paniscus''
|''Pan paniscus''
Line 97: Line 97:
|Line transects
|Line transects
|
|
|Grossmann et al. 2008
|[[#R01625|Grossmann et al. 2008]]
|
|
|
|COD0170, COD0183<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" data-expandtext="+2 more" data-collapsetext="less">COD0184, COD0188</div>
|-
|-
|''Pan paniscus''
|''Pan paniscus''
|2016-2018
|2006
|
|
|
|
|0.54 (0.21-1.21)
|9,246 (3,596-20,720)
|Salonga National Park, South block (17,000 km²,)
|Camera trap
|
|
|Bessone et al. 2020
|7,826 (3,814-10,618)
|Salonga National Park, North Block
|Line transects & recces
|
|
|[[#R01625|Grossman et al. 2008]]
|
|
|COD0170, COD0183<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" data-expandtext="+2 more" data-collapsetext="less">COD0184, COD0188</div>
|-
|-
|''Pan paniscus''
|''Pan paniscus''
|2000
|2005-2006
|
|2.29
|
|
|8
|1.36
|
|
|Salonga Beminyo (<10 km²)
|Lomela Block (2,750 km²)
|Line transects
|Line transects
|
|
|Reinartz et al. 2006
|[[#R01625|Grossman et al. 2008]]
|
|Survey effort: 95.2 km
|
|COD0170, COD0183<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" data-expandtext="+2 more" data-collapsetext="less">COD0184, COD0188</div>
|-
|-
|''Pan paniscus''
|''Pan paniscus''
|2000-2002
|2005-2006
|
|
|24.4
|1.8
|2.78
|
|
|Salonga Lokofa (25 km²)
|Line transects
|
|Reinartz et al. 2006
|
|
|Lomela Block (2,750 km²)
|Reconnaissance walk
|
|
|[[#R01625|Grossman et al. 2008]]
|Survey effort: 515 km
|COD0170, COD0183<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" data-expandtext="+2 more" data-collapsetext="less">COD0184, COD0188</div>
|-
|-
|''Pan paniscus''
|''Pan paniscus''
|2005-2006
|2005
|
|
|2.29
|1.15
|
|0.27 (0.14-0.56)
|
|541 (281-1,119)
|Lomela Block (2,750 km²)
|Salonga Lokofa (2,000 km²)
|Line transects
|Line transects
|
|
|Grossman et al. 2008
|[[#R01625|Grossmann et al. 2008]]
|Survey effort: 95.2 km
|
|
|COD0170, COD0183<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" data-expandtext="+2 more" data-collapsetext="less">COD0184, COD0188</div>
|-
|-
|''Pan paniscus''
|''Pan paniscus''
|2006
|2000-2002
|
|
|24.4
|2.78
|
|
|Salonga Lokofa (25 km²)
|Line transects
|
|
|7,826 (3,814-10,618)
|[[#R01634|Reinartz et al. 2006]]
|Salonga National Park, North Block
|Line transects & recces
|
|Grossman et al. 2008
|
|
|
|COD0152, COD0179<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" data-expandtext="+7 more" data-collapsetext="less">COD0180, COD0182, COD0185, COD0191, COD0192, COD0196, COD0198</div>
|-
|-
|''Pan paniscus''
|''Pan paniscus''
|2005-2006
|2000
|
|
|1.8
|8
|1.36
|
|
|Salonga Beminyo (<10 km²)
|Line transects
|
|
|Lomela Block (2,750 km²)
|[[#R01634|Reinartz et al. 2006]]
|Reconnaissance walk
|
|Grossman et al. 2008
|Survey effort: 515 km
|
|
|COD0152, COD0179<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" data-expandtext="+7 more" data-collapsetext="less">COD0180, COD0182, COD0185, COD0191, COD0192, COD0196, COD0198</div>
|}
|}


Line 184: Line 184:
= Threats =
= Threats =


The bonobo is a taboo animal in some part of the South block, particularly (but not exclusively) in the Iyaelima area (Thompson et al. 2008), where the highest bonobo densities of the site have been observed, despite the presence of 8 permanent villages (Grossmann et al. 2008). However commercial hunters reach very deep into the site and hunting remains the main threat to the ape population (Hart et al. 2008). In addition, the frequent human presence within the site exposes bonobos to human-transmitted diseases such as the Ebola Haemorrhagic Fever. Two recent Ebola outbreaks were recorded north of the site, in Mbandaka (2018) and Boende (2014). Both are major centres in the region, with constant movement of people and traders from, and to, these towns.
The bonobo is a taboo animal in some part of the South block, particularly (but not exclusively) in the Iyaelima area ([[#R01635|Thompson et al. 2008]]), where the highest bonobo densities of the site have been observed, despite the presence of 8 permanent villages ([[#R01625|Grossmann et al. 2008]]). However commercial hunters reach very deep into the site and hunting remains the main threat to the ape population ([[#R01626|Hart et al. 2008]]). In addition, the frequent human presence within the site exposes bonobos to human-transmitted diseases such as the Ebola Haemorrhagic Fever. Two recent Ebola outbreaks were recorded north of the site, in Mbandaka (2018) and Boende (2014). Both are major centres in the region, with constant movement of people and traders from, and to, these towns.


'''Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Salonga National Park'''
'''Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Salonga National Park'''
Line 197: Line 197:
|2.1.1 Shifting agriculture
|2.1.1 Shifting agriculture
|Low (up to 30% of population affected)
|Low (up to 30% of population affected)
|Clearing land for agriculture ([https://salonga.org/the-park/ Salonga National Park]). A small proportion of the site is concerned, with slash and burn concentrated outside the site borders.
|Clearing land for agriculture ([[#R02009|Salonga National Park]]). A small proportion of the site is concerned, with slash and burn concentrated outside the site borders.
|Ongoing (2021)
|Ongoing (2021)
|-
|-
Line 203: Line 203:
|5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals
|5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals
|High (more than 70% of population affected)
|High (more than 70% of population affected)
|SNP has a history of intense poaching for ivory and bushmeat. Bonobos are taboo in some area of the Park, but are nevertheless hunted for commercial purposes, demand for bonobo meat and parts coming from cities outside the block. Signs of both traditional and professional hunting can be found everywhere in the block. (Hart et al., 2008; Bessone pers. comm. 2020). Poaching has led to declines of up to 70% in bonobo numbers in some areas of the park. Surveys in the corridor between the two blocks showed that bonobos were rare or absent within 10 km of villages and completely absent in most of the northern part of the corridor (IUCN & ICCN 2012, WWF n.d.).
|SNP has a history of intense poaching for ivory and bushmeat. Bonobos are taboo in some area of the Park, but are nevertheless hunted for commercial purposes, demand for bonobo meat and parts coming from cities outside the block. Signs of both traditional and professional hunting can be found everywhere in the block. ([[#R01626|Hart et al., 2008]]; Bessone pers. comm. 2020). Poaching has led to declines of up to 70% in bonobo numbers in some areas of the park. Surveys in the corridor between the two blocks showed that bonobos were rare or absent within 10 km of villages and completely absent in most of the northern part of the corridor ([[#R01629|IUCN & ICCN 2012]], [[#R01637|WWF n.d]].).
|2008-Ongoing (2020)
|2008-Ongoing (2020)
|-
|-
Line 215: Line 215:
|Other
|Other
|High (more than 70% of population affected)
|High (more than 70% of population affected)
|Nearly 85% of the north block is within 15 km of a river navigable by dugout canoe (Grossman et al. 2008).
|Nearly 85% of the north block is within 15 km of a river navigable by dugout canoe ([[#R01625|Grossman et al. 2008]]).
|Ongoing (2008)
|Ongoing (2008)
|}
|}
Line 223: Line 223:
= Conservation activities =
= Conservation activities =


WWF has been working in Salonga since 2005, supporting the Congolese park authority ICCN (Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature) in managing the park and engaging with local communities to identify and develop alternative livelihood opportunities (WWF n.d.). Since 2015, WWF is co-managing the park together with the ICCN (WWF n.d.). The site represents the largest existing expanse of legally-protected and intact bonobo habitat; protection of this park and it’s wildlife is therefore of paramount importance (IUCN & ICCN 2012). To control the increase in elephant poaching and the proliferation of military weapons in the region, government armed forces (FARDC) undertook a joint operation with ICCN, called Operation Bonobo, in 2011 (IUCN & ICCN 2012, Mukpo 2019). The operation was said to be successful in returning the ICCN control of the park.
[[#R02139|WWF has been working in Salonga since 2005]], supporting the Congolese park authority ICCN (Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature) in managing the park and engaging with local communities to identify and develop alternative livelihood opportunities ([[#R01637|WWF n.d]].). Since 2015, WWF is co-managing the park together with the ICCN ([[#R01637|WWF n.d]].). The site represents the largest existing expanse of legally-protected and intact bonobo habitat; protection of this park and it’s wildlife is therefore of paramount importance ([[#R01629|IUCN & ICCN 2012]]). To control the increase in elephant poaching and the proliferation of military weapons in the region, government armed forces (FARDC) undertook a joint operation with ICCN, called Operation Bonobo, in 2011 ([[#R01629|IUCN & ICCN 2012]], [[#R01632|Mukpo 2019]]). The operation was said to be successful in returning the ICCN control of the park.


'''Table 4. Conservation activities reported for Salonga National Park'''
'''Table 4. Conservation activities reported for Salonga National Park'''
Line 235: Line 235:
|2 Counter-wildlife crime
|2 Counter-wildlife crime
|2.11 Implement monitoring surveillance strategies (e.g., SMART) or use monitoring data to improve effectiveness of patrols
|2.11 Implement monitoring surveillance strategies (e.g., SMART) or use monitoring data to improve effectiveness of patrols
|Introduction of SMART to support anti-poaching efforts (WWF n.d., IUCN 2020).
|Introduction of SMART to support anti-poaching efforts ([[#R01637|WWF n.d.]], [[#R01628|IUCN 2020]]).
|
|
|Ongoing (2020)
|Ongoing (2020)
Line 241: Line 241:
|2 Counter-wildlife crime
|2 Counter-wildlife crime
|2.3 Conduct regular anti-poaching patrols
|2.3 Conduct regular anti-poaching patrols
|Regular patrols are conducted by the Park management and have significantly increased over the past 5 years (IUCN 2020).
|Regular patrols are conducted by the Park management and have significantly increased over the past 5 years ([[#R01628|IUCN 2020]]).
|
|
|Ongoing (2020)
|Ongoing (2020)
Line 247: Line 247:
|2 Counter-wildlife crime
|2 Counter-wildlife crime
|2.7 Provide better equipment (e.g., guns) to anti-poaching ranger patrols
|2.7 Provide better equipment (e.g., guns) to anti-poaching ranger patrols
|IUCN 2020
|[[#R01628|IUCN 2020]]
|
|
|Ongoing (2020)
|Ongoing (2020)
Line 253: Line 253:
|2 Counter-wildlife crime
|2 Counter-wildlife crime
|2.8 Provide training to anti-poaching ranger patrols
|2.8 Provide training to anti-poaching ranger patrols
|IUCN 2020
|[[#R01628|IUCN 2020]]
|
|
|2018 and 2020
|2018 and 2020
Line 259: Line 259:
|4 Education & awareness
|4 Education & awareness
|4.1 Educate local communities about apes and sustainable use
|4.1 Educate local communities about apes and sustainable use
|IUCN 2020
|[[#R01628|IUCN 2020]]
|
|
|Ongoing (2020)
|Ongoing (2020)
Line 271: Line 271:
|8 Permanent presence
|8 Permanent presence
|8.3 Permanent presence of staff/manager
|8.3 Permanent presence of staff/manager
|IUCN 2020
|[[#R01628|IUCN 2020]]
|
|
|Ongoing (2020)
|Ongoing (2020)
Line 291: Line 291:
|1 Site management
|1 Site management
|1.3 Corruption
|1.3 Corruption
|WWF n.d.
|[[#R01637|WWF n.d]].
|
|
|-
|-
|2 Resources and capacity
|2 Resources and capacity
|2.1 Lack of capacity/training
|2.1 Lack of capacity/training
|WWF n.d.
|[[#R01637|WWF n.d]].
|
|
|-
|-
|2 Resources and capacity
|2 Resources and capacity
|2.5 Lack of equipment/transportation
|2.5 Lack of equipment/transportation
|WWF n.d.
|[[#R01637|WWF n.d]].
|
|
|}
|}
Line 353: Line 353:
= Research activities =
= Research activities =


Reinartz et al. (2006; 2008), Grossmann et al. (2008), Maisels et al. (2010), WCS (2015) and Bessone et al. (2020) conducted surveys estimating bonobo and other species densities. Hart et al. (2008) reported on the impact of human activities on bonobos, and Thompson et al. (2008) on traditional culture of the Iyaelima people, with regard to bonobo conservation. In the buffer zone, west of the site, the LuiKotale Bonobo Project is conducting research on habituated bonobos, focusing on all aspects of bonobos’ ecology, physiology, behaviour and evolutionary history, as well as on ethnobotany (Hohmann and Fruth 2003).
[[#R01634|Reinartz et al. (2006]]; 2008), [[#R01625|Grossmann et al. (2008)]], [[#R01631|Maisels et al. (2010)]], [[#R01636|WCS (2015)]] and [[#R01622|Bessone et al. (2020)]] conducted surveys estimating bonobo and other species densities. [[#R01626|Hart et al. (2008)]] reported on the impact of human activities on bonobos, and [[#R01635|Thompson et al. (2008)]] on traditional culture of the Iyaelima people, with regard to bonobo conservation. In the buffer zone, west of the site, the LuiKotale Bonobo Project is conducting research on habituated bonobos, focusing on all aspects of bonobos’ ecology, physiology, behaviour and evolutionary history, as well as on ethnobotany ([[#R01627|Hohmann and Fruth 2003]]).
Research by Bessone et al. (2021) revealed that increasingly drier conditions have resulted in longer decay times of bonobo nests in Salonga. As climate change continues to affect the processes of nest decomposition and nest construction behaviour, nest decomposition times are likely to increase further in future years (Bessone et al. 2021). Unless population assessments account for this variation in nest decay, it may lead to the erroneous conclusion of increasing ape numbers when populations are actually stable or decreasing (Bessone et al. 2021).
Research by [[#R01621|Bessone et al. (2021)]] revealed that increasingly drier conditions have resulted in longer decay times of bonobo nests in Salonga. As climate change continues to affect the processes of nest decomposition and nest construction behaviour, nest decomposition times are likely to increase further in future years ([[#R01621|Bessone et al. 2021]]). Unless population assessments account for this variation in nest decay, it may lead to the erroneous conclusion of increasing ape numbers when populations are actually stable or decreasing ([[#R01621|Bessone et al. 2021]]).




Line 515: Line 515:
= References =
= References =


Bessone, M., Kühl, H. S., Hohmann, G., Herbinger, I., N'Goran, K. P., Asanzi, P., . . . Beka, B. (2020). Drawn out of the shadows: Surveying secretive forest species with camera-trap distance sampling. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57(5), 963-974. <br>
<span id="R01621"></span>Bessone, M., Booto, L., Santos, A. R., Kühl, H. S., & Fruth, B. (2021). No time to rest: How the effects of climate change on nest decay threaten the conservation of apes in the wild. ''PLOS ONE'', 16(6), e0252527. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252527 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252527]
Bessone, M., Booto, L., Santos, A. R., Kühl, H. S., & Fruth, B. (2021). No time to rest: How the effects of climate change on nest decay threaten the conservation of apes in the wild. PloS one, 16(6), e0252527. <br>
 
BirdLife International. (2021). Important Bird Areas factsheet: Salonga National Park. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 11/11/2021. <br>
<span id="R01622"></span>Bessone, M., Kühl, H. S., Hohmann, G., Herbinger, I., N'Goran, K. P., Asanzi, P., …, & Fruth, B. (2020). Drawn out of the shadows: Surveying secretive forest species with camera trap distance sampling. ''Journal of Applied Ecology'', 57(5), 963-974. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13602 doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13602]
Fruth, B., Hickey, J. M., Andre, C., Furuichi, T., Hart, J., Hart, T., . . . Reinartz, G. (2016). Pan paniscus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T15932A102331567. <br>
 
Grossmann, F., Hart, J. A., Vosper, A., & Ilambu, O. (2008). Range occupation and population estimates of bonobos in the Salonga National Park: application to large-scale surveys of bonobos in the Democratic Republic of Congo. In The Bonobos (pp. 189-216): Springer. <br>
<span id="R01623"></span>BirdLife International. (2021). Important Bird Areas factsheet: Salonga National Park. Retrieved November 11, 2021, from https://www.birdlife.org
Hart, J. A., Grossmann, F., Vosper, A., & Ilanga, J. (2008). Human hunting and its impact on bonobos in the Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo. In The Bonobos (pp. 245-271): Springer. <br>
 
Hohmann, G., & Fruth, B. (2003). Lui Kotal: a new site for field research on bonobos in the Salonga National Park. Pan Africa News, 10(2), 25-27. <br>
<span id="R01624"></span>Fruth, B., Hickey, J. R., André, C., Furuichi, T., Hart, J., Hart, T., …, & Williamson, E. A. (2016). Pan paniscus. ''IUCN Red List of Threatened Species''. [https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.uk.2016-2.rlts.t15932a17964305.en doi:10.2305/iucn.uk.2016-2.rlts.t15932a17964305.en]
IUCN (2020). Salonga National Park - 2020 Conservation Outlook Assessment. IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org. <br>
 
IUCN & ICCN. (2012). Bonobo (Pan paniscus): Conservation Strategy 2012–2022. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group & Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature. 65 pp. <br>
<span id="R01625"></span>Grossmann, F., Hart, J. A., Vosper, A., & Ilambu, O. (2008). Range Occupation and Population Estimates of Bonobos in the Salonga National Park: Application to Large-scale Surveys of Bonobos in the Democratic Republic of Congo. In ''Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects'' (pp. 189-216). Springer New York. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74787-3_11 doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74787-3_11]
Kano, T. (1984). Distribution of pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) in the central Zaire basin. Folia primatologica, 43(1), 36-52. <br>
 
Thompson, J. M., Nestor, L. M., & Kabanda, R. B. (2008). Traditional land-use practices for bonobo conservation. In The Bonobos (pp. 227-244): Springer. <br>
<span id="R01626"></span>Hart, J. A., Grossmann, F., Vosper, A., & Ilanga, J. (2008). Human Hunting and its Impact on Bonobos in the Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo. In ''Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects'' (pp. 245-271). Springer New York. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74787-3_13 doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74787-3_13]
Maisels, F., Nkumu, P., Bonyenge, A., & Naky, P. (2010). Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo: Terrestrial Wildlife and Human-Impact Monitoring Programme. Survey Report–Eastern Sector of Park. Unpublished report, Wildlife Conservation Society, New York. <br>
 
Mukpo, A. (2019, June 12). Did efforts to protect DRC’s elephants and bonobos leave a trail of abuses? Mongabay. https://news.mongabay.com/2019/06/did-efforts-to-protect-drcs-elephants-and-bonobos-leave-a-trail-of-abuses/ <br>
<span id="R01627"></span>Hohmann, G., & Fruth, B. (2003). Lui Kotal - A new site for field research on bonobos in the Salonga National Park. ''Pan Africa News'', 10(2), 25-27. [https://doi.org/10.5134/143430 doi:10.5134/143430]
Reinartz, G. E., Isia, I. B., Ngamankosi, M., & Wema, L. W. (2006). Effects of Forest Type and Human Presence on Bonobo ( Pan paniscus) Density in the Salonga National Park. International Journal of Primatology, 27(4), 1229-1231. <br>
 
Reinartz, G. E., Guislain, P., Bolinga, T. M., Isomana, E., Inogwabini, B.-I., Bokomo, N., . . . Wema, L. W. (2008). Ecological factors influencing bonobo density and distribution in the Salonga National Park: applications for population assessment. In The Bonobos (pp. 167-188): Springer. <br>
<span id="R01628"></span>IUCN. (2020). Salonga National Park: 2020 conservation outlook assessment. IUCN World Heritage Outlook. https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org
WCS (2015). Survey of the Lokofa Block of the Salonga National Park: preliminary report. Wildlife Conservation Society, Kinshasa, DRC. <br>
 
WWF. (n.d.). Salonga Programme. Online: https://www.wwf-congobasin.org/where_we_work/democratic_republic_of_congo/salonga_programme/ <br>
<span id="R01629"></span>IUCN, & ICCN (2012). Bonobo (Pan paniscus): Conservation Strategy 2012–2022. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group & Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature. [http://www.primate-sg.org/storage/pdf/Bonobo_Conservation_Strategy.pdf link]
 
<span id="R01630"></span>Kano, T. (1984). Distribution of Pygmy Chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) in the Central Zaire Basin. ''Folia Primatologica'', 43(1), 36-52. [https://doi.org/10.1159/000156169 doi:10.1159/000156169]
 
<span id="R01631"></span>Maisels, F., Nkumu, P., Bonyenge, A., & Naky, P. (2010). Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo: Terrestrial wildlife and human-impact monitoring programme. Survey report—Eastern sector of park [Unpublished report]. Wildlife Conservation Society.
 
<span id="R01632"></span>Mukpo, A. (2019, June 12). Did efforts to protect DRC’s elephants and bonobos leave a trail of abuses? Mongabay. https://news.mongabay.com/2019/06/did-efforts-to-protect-drcs-elephants-and-bonobos-leave-a-trail-of-abuses/
 
<span id="R01633"></span>Reinartz, G. E., Guislain, P., Bolinga, T. D. M., Isomana, E., Inogwabini, B., Bokomo, N., …, & Wema, L. W. (2008). Ecological Factors Influencing Bonobo Density and Distribution in the Salonga National Park: Applications for Population Assessment. In ''Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects'' (pp. 167-188). Springer New York. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74787-3_10 doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74787-3_10]
 
<span id="R01634"></span>Reinartz, G. E., Isia, I. B., Ngamankosi, M., & Wema, L. W. (2006). Effects of Forest Type and Human Presence on Bonobo (Pan paniscus) Density in the Salonga National Park1. ''International Journal of Primatology'', 27(2), 603-634. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-006-9020-9 doi:10.1007/s10764-006-9020-9]
 
<span id="R01635"></span>Thompson, J. M., Nestor, L. M., & Kabanda, R. B. (2008). Traditional Land-use Practices for Bonobo Conservation. In ''Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects'' (pp. 227-244). Springer New York. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74787-3_12 doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74787-3_12]
 
<span id="R01636"></span>WCS. (2015). Survey of the Lokofa Block of the Salonga National Park: Preliminary report. Wildlife Conservation Society.
 
<span id="R01637"></span>WWF. (n.d.). Salonga Programme. https://www.wwf-congobasin.org/where_we_work/democratic_republic_of_congo/salonga_programme/ [https://web.archive.org/web/20220407124044/https://www.wwf-congobasin.org/where_we_work/democratic_republic_of_congo/salonga_programme/ link]
 
<span id="R02139"></span>WWF. (2005). Anti-poaching patrol saves gorilla in Cameroon. Online: https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?21899/b-Africa-Update-BBRAnti-poaching-patrol-saves-gorilla-in-Cameroon
 
<span id="R02009"></span>Salonga National Park. https://salonga.org/the-park/





Latest revision as of 20:10, 14 October 2026

Central Africa > Democratic Republic of the Congo > Salonga National Park

Français | Português | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | Melayu

Summary

Loading map...
  • Bonobos (Pan paniscus) are present in Salonga National Park.
  • It has been estimated that 9,246 (CI: 3,596-20,720) individuals occur in the South Block (2018 estimate), and 7,826 (CI: 3,814-10,618) individuals inhabit the North Block (2006 estimate).
  • The bonobo population trend is unknown.
  • The site has a total size of 33,350 km².
  • Hunting is the most important threat to bonobos; expansion of land for agriculture and disease transmission threaten the bonobo population to a lower extent, but may increase in severity in the nearby future.
  • Conservation activities have focused on biomonitoring, anti-poaching patrols and surveillance with SMART software application, education and awareness raising, and presence of researchers and staff.
  • The park was declared a World Heritage Site in 1984 and is the largest expanse of legally protected bonobo habitat.
  • View of Salonga National Park, South Block, from the guard Station of Anga © Mattia Bessone – PNS Survey
  • A small stream on the path to Iyaelima, Sector of Anga © Mattia Bessone – PNS Survey
  • Luilaka river, Sector of Monkoto © Mattia Bessone – PNS Survey

Site characteristics

Salonga National Park (SNP) is the largest protected area of pristine rainforest in the African continent (33,500 km²). Located south of the Congo river, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, it is a UNESCO World Heritage site and a stronghold for many endangered species. SNP, is divided into two blocks, North and South, separated by a 45 km wide inhabited buffer zone. Since 2015, the park is co-managed by the Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation (ICCN) in collaboration with the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). In addition to bonobos, SNP harbours one of the few remnant populations of forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis) in the country. SNP is also home to 8 species of monkeys: Thollon’s red colobus (Piliocolobus tholloni), the Angola Pied Colobus (Colobus angolensis), Allen’s Swamp Monkey (Allenopithecus nigroviridis), Red-tailed monkey (Cercopithecus ascanius), Wolf's mona monkey (Cercopithecus wolfii), De Brazza’s Monkey (Cercopithecus neglectus), the Black Mangabey (Lophocebus aterrinus) and the Golden-bellied mangabey (Cercocebus chrysogaster). A large ungulate community is found in the Park, including the forest buffalo (Syncerus caffer) and the endangered Bongo (Tragelaphus euryceros), along with large carnivores such a the leopard (Panthera pardus) and the African golden cat (Caracal aurata). Finally, SNP is a stronghold for other endangered mammals such as the Giant ground pangolin (Smutsia gigantea), and for stunning birds such as the endemic Congo peafowl (Afropavo congensis). The entomofauna and floral diversity is equally rich, with many species expected being still unknown to science.

Table 1. Basic site information for Salonga National Park

Species Pan paniscus
Area 33,350 km²
Coordinates Lat: -2.533783 , Lon: 20.907380
Type of site Protected area (National Park)
Habitat types Subtropical/tropical moist lowland forest, Subtropical/tropical swamp forest, Savanna, Agricultural land, Wetlands (lakes, rivers, streams, bogs, marshes)
Type of governance Shared governance

Types of sites Governance types Habitat types

Ape status

Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Salonga National Park

Species Year Occurrence Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day) Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) Abundance estimate (95% CI) Survey area Sampling method Analytical framework Source Comments A.P.E.S. database ID
Pan paniscus 2016-2018 0.54 (0.21-1.21) 9,246 (3,596-20,720) Salonga National Park, South block (17,000 km²,) Camera trap Bessone et al. 2020 COD0195
Pan paniscus 2015 3.19 0.38 (0.15-0.96) 1,042 (419-2,591) Salonga Lokofa (2,700 km²) Line transects WCS 2015 COD0186
Pan paniscus 2006 2.20 0.51 (0.28-1.01) 1,282 (699-2,533) Salonga Iyaelima (2,500 km²) Line transects Grossmann et al. 2008 COD0170, COD0183
COD0184, COD0188
Pan paniscus 2006 7,826 (3,814-10,618) Salonga National Park, North Block Line transects & recces Grossman et al. 2008 COD0170, COD0183
COD0184, COD0188
Pan paniscus 2005-2006 2.29 Lomela Block (2,750 km²) Line transects Grossman et al. 2008 Survey effort: 95.2 km COD0170, COD0183
COD0184, COD0188
Pan paniscus 2005-2006 1.8 Lomela Block (2,750 km²) Reconnaissance walk Grossman et al. 2008 Survey effort: 515 km COD0170, COD0183
COD0184, COD0188
Pan paniscus 2005 1.15 0.27 (0.14-0.56) 541 (281-1,119) Salonga Lokofa (2,000 km²) Line transects Grossmann et al. 2008 COD0170, COD0183
COD0184, COD0188
Pan paniscus 2000-2002 24.4 2.78 Salonga Lokofa (25 km²) Line transects Reinartz et al. 2006 COD0152, COD0179
COD0180, COD0182, COD0185, COD0191, COD0192, COD0196, COD0198
Pan paniscus 2000 8 1.36 Salonga Beminyo (<10 km²) Line transects Reinartz et al. 2006 COD0152, COD0179
COD0180, COD0182, COD0185, COD0191, COD0192, COD0196, COD0198

Sampling methods Analytical frameworks

Biomonitoring team © Bernard Ikembelo – PNS Survey

Threats

The bonobo is a taboo animal in some part of the South block, particularly (but not exclusively) in the Iyaelima area (Thompson et al. 2008), where the highest bonobo densities of the site have been observed, despite the presence of 8 permanent villages (Grossmann et al. 2008). However commercial hunters reach very deep into the site and hunting remains the main threat to the ape population (Hart et al. 2008). In addition, the frequent human presence within the site exposes bonobos to human-transmitted diseases such as the Ebola Haemorrhagic Fever. Two recent Ebola outbreaks were recorded north of the site, in Mbandaka (2018) and Boende (2014). Both are major centres in the region, with constant movement of people and traders from, and to, these towns.

Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Salonga National Park

Category Specific threats Threat level Description Year of threat
2 Agriculture & aquaculture 2.1.1 Shifting agriculture Low (up to 30% of population affected) Clearing land for agriculture (Salonga National Park). A small proportion of the site is concerned, with slash and burn concentrated outside the site borders. Ongoing (2021)
5 Biological resource use 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals High (more than 70% of population affected) SNP has a history of intense poaching for ivory and bushmeat. Bonobos are taboo in some area of the Park, but are nevertheless hunted for commercial purposes, demand for bonobo meat and parts coming from cities outside the block. Signs of both traditional and professional hunting can be found everywhere in the block. (Hart et al., 2008; Bessone pers. comm. 2020). Poaching has led to declines of up to 70% in bonobo numbers in some areas of the park. Surveys in the corridor between the two blocks showed that bonobos were rare or absent within 10 km of villages and completely absent in most of the northern part of the corridor (IUCN & ICCN 2012, WWF n.d.). 2008-Ongoing (2020)
8 Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases 8.4 Pathogens Low (up to 30% of population affected) The frequent presence of humans, particularly (but not solely) due to the presence of 8 villages within the site borders, exposes bonobos to human-transmitted diseases such as Ebola Haemorrhagic Fever, with two recent outbreaks north of the Park, in Mbandaka (2018) and Boende (2014). 2014, 2018
4 Transportation & service corridors Other High (more than 70% of population affected) Nearly 85% of the north block is within 15 km of a river navigable by dugout canoe (Grossman et al. 2008). Ongoing (2008)

Threats

Conservation activities

WWF has been working in Salonga since 2005, supporting the Congolese park authority ICCN (Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature) in managing the park and engaging with local communities to identify and develop alternative livelihood opportunities (WWF n.d.). Since 2015, WWF is co-managing the park together with the ICCN (WWF n.d.). The site represents the largest existing expanse of legally-protected and intact bonobo habitat; protection of this park and it’s wildlife is therefore of paramount importance (IUCN & ICCN 2012). To control the increase in elephant poaching and the proliferation of military weapons in the region, government armed forces (FARDC) undertook a joint operation with ICCN, called Operation Bonobo, in 2011 (IUCN & ICCN 2012, Mukpo 2019). The operation was said to be successful in returning the ICCN control of the park.

Table 4. Conservation activities reported for Salonga National Park

Category Specific activity Description Implementing organization(s) Year of activity
2 Counter-wildlife crime 2.11 Implement monitoring surveillance strategies (e.g., SMART) or use monitoring data to improve effectiveness of patrols Introduction of SMART to support anti-poaching efforts (WWF n.d., IUCN 2020). Ongoing (2020)
2 Counter-wildlife crime 2.3 Conduct regular anti-poaching patrols Regular patrols are conducted by the Park management and have significantly increased over the past 5 years (IUCN 2020). Ongoing (2020)
2 Counter-wildlife crime 2.7 Provide better equipment (e.g., guns) to anti-poaching ranger patrols IUCN 2020 Ongoing (2020)
2 Counter-wildlife crime 2.8 Provide training to anti-poaching ranger patrols IUCN 2020 2018 and 2020
4 Education & awareness 4.1 Educate local communities about apes and sustainable use IUCN 2020 Ongoing (2020)
5 Protection & restoration 5.2 Legally protect ape habitat National Park since 1970. 1970-Ongoing (2026)
8 Permanent presence 8.3 Permanent presence of staff/manager IUCN 2020 Ongoing (2020)

Conservation activities

Challenges

Table 5. Challenges reported for Salonga National Park

Challenges Specific challenges Source Year(s)
1 Site management 1.3 Corruption WWF n.d.
2 Resources and capacity 2.1 Lack of capacity/training WWF n.d.
2 Resources and capacity 2.5 Lack of equipment/transportation WWF n.d.

Challenges

Enablers

Table 6. Enablers reported for Salonga National Park

Enablers Specific enablers Source Year(s)
1 Site management
2 Resources and capacity
3 Engaged community
4 Institutional support
5 Ecological context
6 Safety and stability

Enablers

Research activities

Reinartz et al. (2006; 2008), Grossmann et al. (2008), Maisels et al. (2010), WCS (2015) and Bessone et al. (2020) conducted surveys estimating bonobo and other species densities. Hart et al. (2008) reported on the impact of human activities on bonobos, and Thompson et al. (2008) on traditional culture of the Iyaelima people, with regard to bonobo conservation. In the buffer zone, west of the site, the LuiKotale Bonobo Project is conducting research on habituated bonobos, focusing on all aspects of bonobos’ ecology, physiology, behaviour and evolutionary history, as well as on ethnobotany (Hohmann and Fruth 2003). Research by Bessone et al. (2021) revealed that increasingly drier conditions have resulted in longer decay times of bonobo nests in Salonga. As climate change continues to affect the processes of nest decomposition and nest construction behaviour, nest decomposition times are likely to increase further in future years (Bessone et al. 2021). Unless population assessments account for this variation in nest decay, it may lead to the erroneous conclusion of increasing ape numbers when populations are actually stable or decreasing (Bessone et al. 2021).


Documented behaviours

Table 7. Behaviours documented for Salonga National Park

Category Behavior Observation type Prevalence Observation dates Source Habituation Species Comment
Not reported

Behaviours

Exposure to climate change impacts

Table 8. Estimated past and projected climatological characteristics in Salonga National Park

Value 1981-2010 2021-2050, RCP 2.6 2021-2050, RCP 6.0 2071-2099, RCP 2.6 2071-2099, RCP 6.0
Mean temperature [C] 25.2 26.4 26.4 26.6 27.7
Annual precipitation [mm] 1851 1829 1823 1834 1851
Max no. consecutive dry days (per year) 12.9 16.2 15.9 19.1 15.4
No. days with heavy precipitation (per year) 6.8 9.7 10.3 9.8 12.2


Table 9. Projected exposure of apes to extreme climate impact events in Salonga National Park

Type No. of years with event (2021-2050, RCP 2.6) % of site exposed (2021-2050, RCP 2.6) No. of years with event (2021-2050, RCP 6.0) % of site exposed (2021-2050, RCP 6.0) No. of years with event (2070-2099, RCP 2.6) % of site exposed (2070-2099, RCP 2.6) No. of years with event (2070-2099, RCP 6.0) % of site exposed (2070-2099, RCP 6.0)
Crop failure 20 0.01 17 0.01 19 0.01 29 0.02
Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Heatwave 10.5 41.73 11.5 29.11 12 43.06 25 55.5
River flood 1.5 0.04 2.25 0.38 2.75 0.39 5 1.77
Tropical cyclone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wildfire 30 0.57 30 0.56 29 0.6 29 0.42


  • Precipitation anomaly in Salonga National Park
  • Temperature anomaly in Salonga National Park

External links

Salonga National Park UNESCO World Heritage

Salonga National Park IUCN World Heritage Outlook

Salonga National Park WWF

References

Bessone, M., Booto, L., Santos, A. R., Kühl, H. S., & Fruth, B. (2021). No time to rest: How the effects of climate change on nest decay threaten the conservation of apes in the wild. PLOS ONE, 16(6), e0252527. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252527

Bessone, M., Kühl, H. S., Hohmann, G., Herbinger, I., N'Goran, K. P., Asanzi, P., …, & Fruth, B. (2020). Drawn out of the shadows: Surveying secretive forest species with camera trap distance sampling. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57(5), 963-974. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13602

BirdLife International. (2021). Important Bird Areas factsheet: Salonga National Park. Retrieved November 11, 2021, from https://www.birdlife.org

Fruth, B., Hickey, J. R., André, C., Furuichi, T., Hart, J., Hart, T., …, & Williamson, E. A. (2016). Pan paniscus. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. doi:10.2305/iucn.uk.2016-2.rlts.t15932a17964305.en

Grossmann, F., Hart, J. A., Vosper, A., & Ilambu, O. (2008). Range Occupation and Population Estimates of Bonobos in the Salonga National Park: Application to Large-scale Surveys of Bonobos in the Democratic Republic of Congo. In Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects (pp. 189-216). Springer New York. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74787-3_11

Hart, J. A., Grossmann, F., Vosper, A., & Ilanga, J. (2008). Human Hunting and its Impact on Bonobos in the Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo. In Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects (pp. 245-271). Springer New York. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74787-3_13

Hohmann, G., & Fruth, B. (2003). Lui Kotal - A new site for field research on bonobos in the Salonga National Park. Pan Africa News, 10(2), 25-27. doi:10.5134/143430

IUCN. (2020). Salonga National Park: 2020 conservation outlook assessment. IUCN World Heritage Outlook. https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org

IUCN, & ICCN (2012). Bonobo (Pan paniscus): Conservation Strategy 2012–2022. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group & Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature. link

Kano, T. (1984). Distribution of Pygmy Chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) in the Central Zaire Basin. Folia Primatologica, 43(1), 36-52. doi:10.1159/000156169

Maisels, F., Nkumu, P., Bonyenge, A., & Naky, P. (2010). Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo: Terrestrial wildlife and human-impact monitoring programme. Survey report—Eastern sector of park [Unpublished report]. Wildlife Conservation Society.

Mukpo, A. (2019, June 12). Did efforts to protect DRC’s elephants and bonobos leave a trail of abuses? Mongabay. https://news.mongabay.com/2019/06/did-efforts-to-protect-drcs-elephants-and-bonobos-leave-a-trail-of-abuses/

Reinartz, G. E., Guislain, P., Bolinga, T. D. M., Isomana, E., Inogwabini, B., Bokomo, N., …, & Wema, L. W. (2008). Ecological Factors Influencing Bonobo Density and Distribution in the Salonga National Park: Applications for Population Assessment. In Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects (pp. 167-188). Springer New York. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74787-3_10

Reinartz, G. E., Isia, I. B., Ngamankosi, M., & Wema, L. W. (2006). Effects of Forest Type and Human Presence on Bonobo (Pan paniscus) Density in the Salonga National Park1. International Journal of Primatology, 27(2), 603-634. doi:10.1007/s10764-006-9020-9

Thompson, J. M., Nestor, L. M., & Kabanda, R. B. (2008). Traditional Land-use Practices for Bonobo Conservation. In Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects (pp. 227-244). Springer New York. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74787-3_12

WCS. (2015). Survey of the Lokofa Block of the Salonga National Park: Preliminary report. Wildlife Conservation Society.

WWF. (n.d.). Salonga Programme. https://www.wwf-congobasin.org/where_we_work/democratic_republic_of_congo/salonga_programme/ link

WWF. (2005). Anti-poaching patrol saves gorilla in Cameroon. Online: https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?21899/b-Africa-Update-BBRAnti-poaching-patrol-saves-gorilla-in-Cameroon

Salonga National Park. https://salonga.org/the-park/


Page created by: Mattia Bessone Date: 2021-11-02

Page updated by: APES Atlas Team Date: 2025-10-29